constitution law of india by j.n pandey pdf

As observed by the Privy Council in Channing Arnold v. Before Independence, there was no constitutional or statutory provision to protect the freedom of press. Thus the press is subject to the restrictions that are provided under the Article 19(2) of the Constitution. Freedom of press is implied from the Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. Union of India, the Supreme Court held that the freedom of speech and expression has no geographical limitation and it carries with it the right of a citizen to gather information and to exchange thought with others not only in India but abroad also.The constitution of India does not specifically mention the freedom of press. Main article:In a landmark judgment of the case Maneka Gandhi v. FlexibilityAccording to, 'The Indian constitution is first and foremost a social document, and is aided by its Parts III & IV (Fundamental Rights & Directive Principles of State Policy, respectively) acting together, as its chief instruments and its conscience, in realising the goals set by it for all the people.' The constitution has deliberately been worded in generalities (not in vague terms) to ensure its flexibility., the fourth, said that a constitution's 'great outlines should be marked, its important objects designated, and the minor ingredients which compose those objects be deduced from the nature of the objects themselves.' The Supreme Court ruled in that judicial review is a basic characteristic of the constitution, overturning Articles 368(4), 368(5) and 31C. The widened Article 31C and added Articles 368(4) and 368(5), stating that any law passed by Parliament could not be challenged in court.

In addition to Article 13, Articles 32, 226 and 227 provide the constitutional basis for judicial review.Due to the adoption of the, the Supreme Court was not allowed to preside over any laws adopted during a state of emergency which infringe under article 32 (the right to constitutional remedies). If such an interpretation is not possible because of inconsistency (and where separation is possible), the provision which is inconsistent with the constitution is considered void.

Constitution law of india by j.n pandey pdf